|
Building and Sustaining Capacity for improving the Achievement of All Childern |
|
| Volume #1, Newsletter #6 |
Janaury 2012 |
|
| IN THIS ISSUE |
Early Learning Institute 2012
Alignment Series
Great by Choice book review
Midwest Leadership Summit V - Mathematics Strand Review |
|
|
Hello,
Happy New Year!
It is hard to believe that another year is upon us! Where does the time go?
This past year has been fraught with challenges to us as educators and educational leaders. We are well aware of these challenges and how they have impacted us personally and professionally and the culture of our schools. We have seen the dismissal of collective bargaining rights for public sector professionals in Wisconsin and attempts to do so in other states. We have seen calls for teacher and administrator accountability linked to student outcomes. We have seen calls for merit pay or pay for performance that is seen as the magic antidote to transform and improve our schools.
Some of these things we have heard are relatively new and others are as old as the hills. These challenges and changes may cause a sense of despair, anger, frustration, and hopelessness. As the advent of a new year dawns, I believe that there is hope and that there are answers. I will say it again, there is hope!
To me, this hope lies not in the politicians and policymakers, but rather in us as a collective of educational professionals and support staff. Yes, we will need to involve politicians and policymakers in the discussion, but I believe that we need to do so once we have documented evidence of increasing outcomes for all students, including our subgroup populations and then sharing that evidence so that real, meaningful change can occur and be shared and scaled-up across all states, districts, and schools in our nation. Yes, I believe that there is hope and that there is a moral imperative that underlies this hope.
My question to you is, do we have a moral imperative to improve outcomes for our students? The answer I believe is a resounding yes and this moral imperative also impacts not only our schools but our societies as well.
Embracing a moral imperative to improve outcomes for all students is much more than talking about the moral imperative. It is talking, but more importantly, it is about action. It is likely that many will not believe that things can change with out seeing the evidence of change. That evidence is data that demonstrates objectively that we can change and improve outcomes for all students.
It is my deeply held belief that we have the knowledge and skills to dramatically improve results for all our students and that we can close the achievement gap that exists in our schools across this nation. That is the good news.
Of course, we will need a commitment to the moral imperative in order to systematically and systemically implement strategies, policies, and practices that support our efforts. Teachers, administrators, professional support personnel, and other support staff require training and support as we move to improve outcomes for all students. If we are to improve outcomes for all students, we also need to improve the conditions for our teachers and administratorrs.
Over the course of the next several months, I will be addressing this topic in more detail in a series of articles that address what we can do to improve practice and outcomes for all students. I do not profess to have all the answers, but it is my desire to initiate dialogue and discussion, provoke thought and discourse, and engender collaborative networks to build the individual and, more importantly, the collective capacity to demonstrate what works for all students and the support that we need in order to create this reality.
As we embark on this new year, let's focus on the variables that we can control, variables that will make a difference in the lives of our students and in our own personal professional lives.
Respectfully,
John H Faust, Executive Director
Midwest Instructional Leadership Council
|
|
|
Midwest Leadership Summit V Mathematics Strand Overview by Maggie Altschaefl - University of Wisconsin-Madison
|
| The Mathematics Strand featured a discussion of implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) for addressing mathematics instruction and intervention. The two-day intensive workshop included presentations by two speakers, Asha K. Jitendra and Matt Burns. Dr. Jitendra is currently the Rodney Wallace Professor for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Minnesota. Her work focuses on effective instructional strategies for mathematical word problem solving. Dr. Burns is also a Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Minnesota and the coordinator of the School Psychology Program. His work concerns linking assessment to intervention to find effective instruction for all students (e.g., curriculum-based assessment) and RtI.
The strand began with a brief introduction from Burns about the main concepts of providing mathematics instruction from an RtI framework. This included emphasizing the importance of effective Tier 1 instruction and the integration of problem-solving into RtI. Three questions were proposed to frame the process of providing effective instruction to all students: (1) Is it a class-wide problem? (2) What is the category of the problem, or what specific skill is the student missing? and (3) What’s the causal variable, or what is the environmental variable that we can manipulate that is most directly related to the problem? Success in mathematics is dependent two types of knowledge, namely conceptual and procedural understanding. Additionally, two types of assessments are used within RtI to make instructional decisions, general outcome measures and sub-skills mastery measures, the latter of which can be used more frequently to measure progress over shorter periods time.
Read more...
|
Upcoming miLc Events
Midwest Leadership Summit VI - October 1-2, 2012 - St. Paul River Centre, St. Paul, MN
For information on speakers and sessions, click here!
Secondary Research to Practice Institute - November 1-2, 2012 - Wilderness Territory, Wisconsin Dells, WI |
|
|
|
Early Learning Institute - March 2, 2012 |
 |
| Dr. Judith Carta |
The second annual Early learning Research to Practice Institute will take place on March 2, 2012 at the Wilderness Territory in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin. The focus of this Institute is on the importance of early education establishing a strong foundation for educational experiences that follow. In short, early learning is the foundation upon which models of response to intervention as an educational service delivery model for all students is built.
Dr. Judith Carta will be the opening key note speaker for the Early Learning Research to Practice Institute. Dr. Carta is the Director of Early Childhood Research at the Juniper Gardens Children’s Project. The focus of her work is evidence-based intervention practices for children's language, literacy, and social-emotional outcomes; parenting interventions focused on vulnerable populations and their effects on young children, and tools for monitoring progress of young children. We are excited that Dr. Carta is joining us!
In addition to Dr. Carta, this Early Learning Research to Practice Institute will offer a number of in-depth strands on topics that are of interest to those professionals and support staff providing early education opportunities. LuAnn Shields will offer a strand on increasing outcomes for students through leadership; Robin Miller-Young will discuss core instruction at the preschool level in her strand session; Maribeth Gettinger will cover the teaching of vocabulary in preschool in her session; Julie Betchkal will provide an overview and discussion of the Pyramid Model for social and emotional competence; and, finally, Dr. Carta will follow her opening keynote address with a session focusing on evidence based RtI foundations for preschool settings that deals directly with early language and literacy instruction. All in all we believe that participants will receive incredible information for building a multi-tier system of supports at the early learning level.
You can learn more about this professional development opportunity by visiting our website. You can also access the registration brochure by clicking here.
Registration is now open. If you have questions about this event or questions about the registration process, please contact |
| Alignment Foundations Blog Series by Brad Niebling |
Let's look back a month, shall we? Last month, I spent some time digging into the question "What is Enacted Curriculum?" This month, I am digging into the area of Assessed Curriculum.
For many, it may seem strange to consider assessment to be a type of curriculum. Does that describe you? Interested to learn more?
Read more...That Alignment Guy Blog
[fb_like] |
Great by Choice - A Book Review by Melissa Botkin, Lonnie Leal, and Gary Schumacher University of Houston - Clear Lake |
| In their book, Great by Choice, Jim Collins and Morten Hansen sought to find out what enables companies to thrive while others fail in a chaotic and unpredictable world. The study facilitated by the authors in this book compiled nine years of research. The researchers identified factors that led to the survival of some companies compared to the failure of their competitors. Collins and Morten analyzed leaders that were able to outlive and outperform their counterparts by more than ten times (termed 10Xers) over a nine-year period (2001-2010). These elite companies surpassed industry competition regardless of varied indexes influenced by stock market fluctuations, terrorist threats, and other events that challenged the survival of many companies in the early 21st century.
Readers who are familiar with Collins’ previous bestseller, Good to Great, will find only vague references to concepts, such as the flywheel and hedgehog theories, in this book. Rather, the authors present a more aggressive manual for surviving 2010 and beyond with new concepts. Discussions center on key concepts such as: the 20 mile march (hitting specific performance markers with great consistency over a long period of time); fire bullets (low-cost, low-risk, and low-distraction), then cannon balls (large returns from concentrated actions); leading above the death line (managing risk); and Collins’ favorite - return on luck (a high return on luck). The researchers encompass their research project into a triangular theory model, consisting of fanatic discipline, productive paranoia and empirical creativity. They explain how 10Xers’ leaders built their companies from the ground up and sustained constant success, surpassing their competitors with a steady but determined 20 mile march. They emphasize that 10xers seemingly look the same as their rivals but their dynamic ability to survive and sustain momentum in harsh and volatile conditions sets them apart.
Read more...
|
| Thank you you for taking time to peruse this issue of
miLc Matters. If you have comments on any of the articles and/or have suggestions for topics that you would like covered in this newsletter, please feel free to contact me at jhfaust.milc@gmail.com. |
Regards,
John H Faust, Executive Director
Midwest Instructional Leadership Council [TM] |
|
| |
|
|