|
Focusing on the importance of licensure, this month's article is written by guest author Liz O'Sullivan, AIA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C, NCARB, SCIP, a Denver consulting architectural construction specifications writer. Comments from a Spec Writer.
Last week I had an experience that makes another good case for the licensure of architects and the regulation of use of the word "architect" and its derivatives.
I was chatting with a parent outside of our kids' after-school activity. She asked what I do for work and I gave my standard brief initial answer, "I'm an architect."
She immediately told me her story. Her family is building an addition on to the house they recently bought. But they're months behind in getting going on construction because of the first architect they hired.
After three months of working with the first architect, the drawings that they received for bidding to contractors couldn't be built from - one bidder after another said he couldn't build from those and needed other drawings. The night before the architect was planning to submit for permit, she checked the code, and found that the addition she'd been designing extended five feet into the setback. They'd have to redesign. My acquaintance went back to her with what the contractors said, she replied defensively that she "could do this," she could submit the drawings and get a permit, this is what she does.
They fired her, and began looking for another architect.
Do the services provided sound like the services of someone who has worked for at least three years under the direct supervision of a licensed architect?
Not to me. But imagine the confusion of someone who has never hired an architect before.
Many single-family residential architects and designers draw more-constructible details, and are more familiar with building codes than many commercial architects (who have much more to learn about, and often, much bigger buildings to work on). They learn from working with experienced residential architects or designers, and from time spent on the jobsite. Less documentation is required for residential builders - contractors who do houses are used to building from pretty sparse documents. If they couldn't build from what my acquaintance had given them, then those documents were pretty bad "construction documents."
The services provided to my acquaintance sound to me like those of an unlicensed designer who hasn't done any building envelope work, only interiors, and had no idea that she wasn't competent enough to design an addition. She probably hadn't worked under a licensed architect for very long, if at all.
(Only if you've worked for at least three years under the direct supervision of a licensed architect, and have passed your licensing exams, can you legally call yourself an architect.)
Knowing that my new acquaintance had moved to Colorado recently, I figured she didn't know that in Colorado, you don't actually need an architect for single family residential work. Many Colorado home designers are not architects. Unfortunately, some of them imply to the public and to their clients that they are architects. Many of them did go to architecture school, and have degrees in architecture. However, a degree in architecture means only that you learned a lot of design and theory, and not much of the stuff you need to know in order to get buildings actually built. That's why you have to work for at least three years under the direct supervision of a licensed architect (and pass your exams) before you can go out and offer architectural services to the public on your own. It's actually possible that the designer my acquaintance hired is an architect, but just a really incompetent one. In my opinion, it's much more likely that she's not licensed.
I feel bad about the money and time lost by my acquaintance. But even more than that, I'm embarrassed to be associated with this "architect" in the mind of my new acquaintance, and in the mind of all consumers who have similar experiences. I'm embarrassed for all architects. People who are not competent at architectural services, and who call themselves architects, bring down all architects in the eyes of the public. Incompetent practitioners in all professions create a bad name for those professionals, of course. But in Colorado, we have a lot of people who are not competent at architectural services simply because of the fact that they do not have enough experience working under someone competent to actually take their exams - but they go ahead and call themselves architects anyway.
Why does this matter, beyond my personal embarrassment? I believe that consumers should be protected, and so do the people of Colorado. That's why the profession of architecture in Colorado is regulated by the Department of Regulatory Agencies. That's why the Colorado Revised Statutes (our laws) require that a person be licensed to practice architecture in Colorado in order to be able to use the titles "architect," "architects," "architecture," "architectural," or "licensed architect." In addition, our laws require that a person be licensed to practice architecture in Colorado in order to use the words "architect," "architects," "architecture," "architectural," or "licensed architect" in any offer to the public to perform architectural services (this includes marketing materials and websites). (A person who is working under the supervision of an architect and is in the process of completing required practice hours in preparation for the architect licensing examination is explicitly allowed to use the term "architectural intern.")
Residential designers are perfectly within their legal rights to design houses and additions to houses. Many of them are very good at what they do. But unless they're licensed architects they're not allowed to imply to their clients that they are architects. Licensure does not guarantee competence, but it sure can weed out the least competent.
After reading Liz's article speaking to the incompetent non-licensed practitioners creating a "bad name" for licensed built environment professionals, now is the time to take a serious look at how you manage your credentials. Are you still using status quo methods of recordkeeping including spreadsheets, file folders, 3 ring binders with color coded tabs? Time to move into the 21st century with a secure technology solution for professional credentials management. Each client monthly electronic report includes the current complete status of all your credentials. Here is your link to learn more: AECredentialing.com.
__________________________________________________________
|
