In the Public Interest is SMW's e-newsletter on public agency topics.
|
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, Winter 2016 |
|
|
|
Welcome!
A new year, and new resolutions. Here at Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, LLP, one of our 2016 resolutions is to provide our clients with fresh, relevant, and useful legal information on a regular basis. We're pleased to bring you
In the Public Interest, our new public agency e-newsletter.
In this issue, we'll tell you why you might want to add "update sign ordinance" to your list of 2016 resolutions. We'll also delve into the evidentiary rules for eminent domain cases, now clarified in a recent Court of Appeal victory for one of the firm's longtime agency clients.
We hope you enjoy this issue, and look forward to connecting with you more in the future. |
|
|
Practical Tips for Sign Ordinances Post-
Reed
|
|
|
In
Reed v. Town of Gilbert, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a local sign ordinance as an unconstitutional restriction on speech, calling into question the constitutionality of other local sign ordinances across the country. We offer a brief guide to updating your sign ordinance in light of
Reed.
-Read more-
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Victory Clarifies Eminent Domain Rules
|
|
|
SMW won a significant victory for the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency when the Court of Appeal upheld a favorable eminent domain jury verdict in
SAFCA v. Dhaliwal. The case clarifies two important evidentiary rules applicable to the jury’s determination of “just compensation.”
-Read more-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the Public Interest is Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, LLP's regular e-newsletter of fresh, relevant, and useful legal information for public agencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are receiving this email because one of our attorneys or planners thought you might be interested in the content. Please click below if you would like to unsubscribe.
|
|
|
© Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP. All rights reserved. Disclaimer. |
|
|
|
|
 | | |
|  |
|
|
|
|
